Measuring Values in Modern School System

Views: 136 | Download: 104


Teaching values in modern schools is a new phenomenon. Malaysian national curriculum at both primary and secondary school levels ensures that students develop desirable attitudes and behaviors based on human, religious, and spiritual values. The inculcation of the values is made possible through various subjects and non-academic subjects and students’ activities. However, knowledge about values education remains limited because there is no measurement device to assess the extent of values teaching in school. To fill this gap, the present study was designed to develop and examine the psychometric properties of an instrument measuring values teaching schools.  Using data from 400 high school students, the study developed and validated a measure called Malaysia School Values Scale (MSVS) tailored to high school students in Malaysia. A robust analysis of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) provides a rigorous analysis of the model power in relation to construct and content validity, confirming the dimension and analyzing the fitness of the data collected in the hypothesized model. This paper provides insight construct and  content analysis using the CFA approach to consider the 15 school values constructs. To achieve the intended research objective, the 15 school values were explored. The results provide evidence that the MSVS achieved sound psychometric properties. The overall reliability value of Cronbach’s Alpha was acceptable. The CFA results showed that the goodness-of-fit indices for the hypothesized model were as follows: x2 (182) = 627.269, p = 0.00, x2/DF = 3.409, GFI = 0.852; AGFI = 0.814, CFI = 0.92; IFI = 0.921, RMSEA = 0.077. Each of the indices was above the threshold value. Results imply that MSVS is a valid measure to describe the school values among high school students. However, more studies are recommended to further validate the scale.

Full Text:



Acat, Abedalaziz, N, Jamaluddin, S. & Chin Hai Leng, H.C., 2013. Measuring Attitudes toward Computer and Internet Usage among Postgraduate Students in Malaysia. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology Volume 12, Number 2, April 2013 ISSN 1303-6521

Al-Fozen, S. Sh,(Compiler), 1997. The Book of Tawheed (Oneness of Allah). Translated and annotated by Mahmoud Ridha Murad. Darussalam Publisher & Distributors, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Amla Salleh, Sharifah Nur Puteh, Mahzan Awang. (2014). Learning to live together through education: Country Study Malaysia. UNESCO Publication

Azimi Hamzah, Steven Eric Kraus, Sidek Mohd Noh, Turiman Suandi, Ramaya Juhari, Jamiah Manap, Khairul Anwar Mastor, Azma Mahmoud, Hasnan Kasan, 2007. Muslim Religiosity & Personality Assessment; Prototype for nation Building. A Research Report. Institute for Social Scinece Studies (IPSAS), Universiti Putera Malaysia.

Balakrishnan. (2009). Teaching Moral Education in Secondary Schools Using Real-life dilemmas. Ph.D thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.

Debats, D.L. & Bartelds, B.F. (1996). The structure of human values: a principal components analysis of the Rokeach Value Survey (RVS).

Feather, N. T. (1986, December). Value systems across cultures: Australia and China. International Journal of Psychology, 21 (6), 697-715.

Fornell, & Larcker. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 39-50.

Gall, Gall, & Borg. (2005). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Garson. (2012). Canonical Correlation. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates Publishers.

Groenland, & Stalpers. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling: A Verbal Approach. Nyenrode Research Paper(12-02).

Hair, Black, Babin, Anderson, & Tatham. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business .

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling. Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76−99). London: Sage.

Jan Cieciuch, Eldad Davidov, Michele Vecchione, Constanze Beierlein4, Shalom H. Schwartz5,6, Eldad Davidov, (2014). The Cross-National Invariance Properties of a New Scale to Measure 19 Basic Human Values: A Test Across Eight Countries Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology March 19, 2014 0: 0022022114527348 v1-22022114527348

Kline. (2005). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Langgulung. (1993). Curriculum Development and Textbook Production in Lower and Upper Secondary level. Paper presented at the Paper presented at International seminar on Islamic Education in Makkah (23-26 May).

Lei, & Wu. (2007). Introduction to structural equation modeling: Issues and practical considerations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(3), 33-43.

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (1989). Education in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Pui-Wa, & Wu. (2007). An NCME Instructional Module on Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Practical Considerations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Fall, 1-11.

Rahman Talib Report. 1960. Penyata Jawatankuasa Penyemak Pelajaran 1960. Kuala Lumpur : Percetakan Kerajaan.

Razak Report. (1956). Penyata Jawatankuasa Pelajaran 1956. KL: Percetakan Kerajaan.

Rokeach. 1973. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

Schwartz, S. H. 2009. Culture matters: National value cultures, sources and consequences. In C.-Y. Chiu, Y.Y. Hong, S. Shavitt, & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research and application (pp. 127-150). New York: Psychology Press

Schwartz, S. H. 2007. Universalism values and the inclusiveness of our moral universe. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 38, 711-728

Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S. A. M., & Harris, M. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 32, 519-542.

Terry Lovat & Ron Toomey (Editors), 2009. Values Education and Quality Teaching The Double helix Effect.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 International Journal of Modern Education Studies

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.