An Application of Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling in TIMSS: A Comparison of Intuitive Definitions of Q-Matrices
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
American Federation of Teachers (AFT). (1999). What TIMSS tells us about mathematics achievement, curriculum, and instruction. In Educational Issues Policy Brief, 10, 2-10.Washington, DC: AFT Educational Issues Department.
Birenbaum, M., Nasser, F., & Tatsuoka, C. (2007). Effects of gender and ethnicity on fourth graders’ knowledge states in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38, 301-319.
Birenbaum, M., Tatsuoka, C., & Yamada, T. (2004). Diagnostic assessment in TIMSS-R: Between countries and within-country comparisons of eighth graders’ mathematics performance. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 30, 151-173.
Chen, Y., Thompson, M., Gorin, J. S., & Tatsuoka K. K. (2008). Cross-Cultural validity of the TIMSS-1999 mathematics test: Verification of a Cognitive Model. International Journal of Testing, 8, 251-271.
de la Torre, J. (2008). An empirically-based method of Q-matrix validation for the DINA model: Development and applications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45, 343-362.
de la Torre, J. (2009). DINA model and parameter estimation: A didactic. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 115-130.
de la Torre, J. (2011). The generalized DINA model framework. Psychometrika, 76, 179-199.
Dogan, E., & Tatsuoka, K. K. (2008). An international comparison using a diagnostic testing model: Turkish students’ profile of mathematical skills on TIMSS-R. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68, 263-272.
Doornik, J. A. (2002). Object-Oriented Matrix Programming Using Ox (Version 3.1) [Computer software]. London: Timberlake Consultants Press.
Foy, P., & Olson, J. F. (2009). TIMSS 2007 user guide for the international database. Chestnut Hill, MA: IEA.
Haertel, E. H. (1989). Using restricted latent class models to map the skill structure of achievement items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 333-352.
Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests in multiple languages. In R. K. Hambleton, P. Merenda, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Junker, B.W., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 258–272.
Lee, Park, & Taylan (2011). Cognitive diagnostic modeling of attribute mastery in Massachusetts, Minnesota, and the U.S. national sample using the TIMSS 2007. International Journal of Testing, 11, 144-177.
Olson, J. F., Martin,M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (2009). TIMSS 2007 technical report. Chestnut Hill, MA: IEA.
Tatsuoka, K. K. (1983). Rule-space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 345-354.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: IEA.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51383/ijonmes.2019.33
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Modern Education Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.